Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stoic Woodsman's avatar

"concept of the nation-state itself (a people with shared lineage and history collectively controlling a discrete geographic space) is increasingly technologically incoherent. Ordinary people’s interests and personal loyalties too routinely transcend its boundaries."

I'd argue there is a deep part of the human psyche that will always cling to space/place as a source of identity of some kind -- but the collision of 'networks' with 'communities' sure has re-factored that in chaotic ways.

Expand full comment
Eidein's avatar

> These are not “jobs Americans won’t do”.

I know we all know this, but when people say "jobs Americas won't do" they are always implying "at the price we are willing to pay" at the end

Although I will stake out this controversial claim even though I expect you all to disagree with me: It is actually literally true that (eg) software engineering is a job that Americans generally can't do, or more specifically, that the pool of Americans able to perform at the level needed for success is not deep enough for all the people who want to hire.

Granted, I think that ~90% of the people who currently do software engineering are not qualified for it. And I'm also eliding over what I call the "artisan vs industrialist" distinction: industrialization doesn't need you to do a quality job, it just needs you to do a standardized job. But it is quite literally true (eg) that the job I currently do, I was hired because _none of the ~40 other engineers at the company were good enough at their jobs for management to trust them with the project I'm working on, so instead they hired me (a non-american) specifically for this project_

"Meritocracy" is a joke and if tech CEOs say they're going back to it, I don't know what their angle is but I know they're lying

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts